It Was Always About Knowing What You Want To Do And How To Do It, And Still Is
LLM tools have become very rapidly widely talked about among all people involved in software. In amongst this there is a lot of fear. LLMs have reached the tipping point on the automation curve where they're both cheap and good enough that avoiding them all together just doesn't make practical sense.
Understandably, many people are worried that their skills are soon to be useless and they might be better off going into a different career sooner than later. I won't deny that this might happen. The machines may outstrip us in intellectual and creative capacity. But if this happens your problems —and society's— will be so bizzare relative to all previous human affairs that it's hard to say what you should do to be best placed afterwards. So instead I'm going to focus on what to do before that, while current trends continue, by talking about previous instances of automation.
When power looms were invented the quality of the fabric they produced was to put it mildly, shit. Power loom fabric was thinner, stiffer, less durable, and had a limited range of design complexity of patterns it could accomodate. The work of handloom weavers continued to be softer, more plush, more durable, and accomodate extremely complex design patterns. It continued to be this way for a long time. In some respect, forever actually. Handmade clothes still bear the reputation of being more durable, more comfortable and so on, and they have that reputation rightly. So why did the power loom win ?
09 February 2026